Shaykh Ibn Jibreen on What is Manifest Clear Kufr and Ruling With Secular Laws
-Shaykh Ibn Jibreen On the khawaarij-
Shaykh Ibn Jibreen was asked, fatwa no 3407, whose text is:
"As for those who make Takfir by way of sins and permit revolt against the rulers then if they revolt against the rulers they are Kharijites and Terrorists (Irhaabiyyoon), and from the Dogs of Hellfire
Some said: Those who make Takfir by way of sins but to not permit revolt against the ruler are not to be called Kharijites. So if you would be gracious enough to explain that. And what is the ruling upon interacting with (i.e. negotiating with) the one who showed (intent towards) reconciliation, and that he has recanted. And are the people to be warned against them due to their ideas?"
Shaykh Ibn Jibreen Answered:
"What was mentioned in this fatwa is correct, for the Scholars have mentioned that it is not permissible to shun obedience and nor to revolt against the Rulers, and nor to separate from the Jamaa'ah, and that it is upon a Muslim to hear and obey those in authority, even if some of the sins appear from them. For revolting against them brings about confusion (strife) and an abundance of tribulations, the violent rocking of the (the current) security, safety (that is present), killing of the innocent, and the attainment of harm. For this reason, the command to hear and obey has come with his (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam's) saying: "Hear and obey, even if your back is beaten and your wealth is confiscated".
And there is no doubt that those who make Takfir by way of sins are considered Kharijites, even if they do not revolt against the Rulers. And it is permissible to interact with the one (from the Kharijites) who showed (his intent) for reconciliation and who performed what is obligatory upon him. So he is to be dealt with just like the Muslims are dealt with, until he displays what opposes the truth and the evidence."
http://www.takfiris.com/…/srjss-shaykh-ibn-jibreen-was-not-…
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shaykh Ibn Jibreen was a person of knowledge who in the early 1990s got involved, unfortunately, with personalities like Muhammad al-Misery and his organization called CDLR (an organization practically working to effect Leninist and Marxist type revolutions in Muslim lands). Through this interaction the Shaykh was led to hold erroneous opinions towards Innovators such as Hasan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb. He proceeded to defend these individuals, not upon knowledge and baseerah or any kind of detailed research, but out of sentiments and out of the affectation he suffered from as a result of being involved with such unsavouries. Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen (rahimahullaah) and other scholars blasted the CDLR in very powerful words and the scholars expressed their disappointment with the likes of Ibn Jibreen getting involved with these people.
Unfortunately that connection harmed the Shaykh in that he became blinded to what these people were really upon, for he, in his methodology, was not upon what these takfiri revolutionaries were upon, even if he was deceived by them.
The above two articles indicate two things:
That Ibn Jibreen invalidated and demolished the very root and foundation of the existence of the Leninist Takfiri da'wah (takfir and revolution), and that despite being deceived on the issue of the personalities of Qutb and Banna, he certainly was not with these people in their evil designs, doctrines of takfir, and deviant non-Islamic, secular methodologies.
That if we take a kind stance towards him, he was not familiar with the misguidances and excesses of Sayyid Qutb and that he defended Qutb, upon lack of knowledge and clarity, whilst pointing out that some of the Scholars do not make this excuse for him because he was made aware of the truth through letters and writing and continued to defend the likes of Qutb and Bannaa despite these innovators falling into what amounts to major kufr in their statements of mockery of the prophets, wahdat ul-wujood, claiming the Prophet forgives, the Qur'an being created and so on.
In any case, Ahl us-Sunnah are more merciful to the Innovators than they are themselves, and whilst we try to lessen the burden for these people, their followers only increase them in their burden of sin by propagandizing for the personalities, books and doctrines of these individuals.
www.sayyidqutb.com
www.sayyidqutb.com
No comments:
Post a Comment